Carrie’s TEBlog

Just another Edublogs.org weblog

New Math article Response

January 30th, 2006 · 3 Comments
Personal Readings




            The article “New Way to Teach to Math Adopted” talks about exactly how I feel about math. I completely agree with the new method of teaching math. It gives students real life problems, and they have to show how they solve them not just memorize a way to do it. This new way promotes problem solving. Every problem has multiple ways to solve it. To me this is the key to math. Even if students go on to do things that do not require extreme math, they still gain things from learning it. Math gives people problem solving skills. They learn to manipulate problems and work out possible creative ways to solve them. I think this relates a lot to our discussions on Discourses. Students learn not only math Discourse, but also learn Discourse that can be applied to real life problems. They learn what to look for in problems and manipulate the variables. It helps open the book to being able to solve any problem they ever encounter. The new way of teaching math from the article, gives people even more ability to do this. They learn how to use things from a classroom to solve real life situations. Also they learn to write out all their solutions. I think once someone learns how to write out their solutions, they gain a better understanding of what they are doing. Being able to express your thoughts on paper helps organize them and make them more real. Math is not just about learning some formula that works, but learning why it works. Writing out the formula and how it is used, helps show why it works. Also working it out helps students see how it builds on other things and how to build off it. Math education desperately needs change, so I think this article is a great way to help bring that about.

Create a free edublog to get your own comment avatar (and more!)

3 responses so far ↓

  • 1    Amy Marsh's Edublog // Feb 1, 2006 at 12:32 am

    Comment on Carrie’s Math Article Response

    Although I am slightly biased because I am also a math major like Carrie, I agree with everything that she had to say in her “New Math Article Response” (http://carmil.edublogs.org/2006/01/30/new-math-article-response/).  Although many st…

  • 2    Michelle // Feb 5, 2006 at 10:56 pm

    In the grade school I work in 3-5, the students have been taught to use and investigations type math called “Bridges”, in the system the students are just supposed to understand how to divide and multiply by playing the games and by figuring out how to do real life problems as described in the article.

    The basic idea that they should be taught how to use math in the real world is a great idea, but I don’t see this program working in a real situation.

    The program doesn’t allow for teaching any traditional math, so you have 5th graders who can’t multiply divide add or subtract without drawing pictures

    They haven’t learned the “number” part of math.

    I think that this program would be a great addition to a more traditional program, but the time that it takes to do an investigative math program doesn’t allow for any traditional teaching.

  • 3    oiywbuashba // Feb 27, 2006 at 2:47 pm

    veoudgwa…

    uhfwuoob…